Live and Learn Categories
Live and Learn Tags
Thursday
04Mar2010

Concrete operations

Two years ago, when we were first exploring long term education options and were looking to absorb as much information as possible, I read two books by David Elkind—The Power of Play and Miseducation, Preschoolers at Risk. Of all the books I've read on child development I believe these are two of my favorites; They ended up being the final push we needed to embrace our growing opposition to today's style of preschool (the kind that replaces imaginative play with the formal learning and computer time), and ultimately the first of many steps down a road that led us to choose homeschooling.

Though parts of both books deal specifically with discipline and the kinds of "stages" that all mothers abhor, they come back to my mind often for their information on Piaget's developmental theory. I believe it was while reading Miseducation that my knowledge of Piaget went from college text book memorization of his theory on stages to a real life grasp of its application. Piaget held that children must achieve certain cognitive abilities before they can learn certain skills, and watching Calvin grow and change these stages have been pretty marked, and having the means to recognize them has been pretty rewarding.

Why am I spouting all this information so suddenly? Because yesterday I experienced one of those "Aha!" moments, a real light bulb going off in my brain while watching Calvin put together a floor puzzle. Several months ago, the last time we had the puzzles out actually, I sat on the floor in much the same position, watching him do the same three puzzles, and experiencing a certain amount of frustration and anxiety. Calvin himself was having a fine time, but watching him repeatedly try to fit together pieces that could not possibly have connected (i.e. hole to hole, peg to peg, or straight edge in the middle) was a bit like nails on a chalkboard for me. Calvin's only real concern with the puzzle pieces was to put the pictures together without any real concern given to shape or orientation. Several times I tried to gently lead him to recognizing the importance of the shapes, but to no real avail.

Yesterday, however, was like a new dawn. After months without even opening the puzzles he flew through the two easiest ones in minutes, and attacked the harder puzzle with an actual plan, by pulling out the edge pieces and connecting them first, beginning in they sky and moving towards the ground. He was sorting pieces based on both color and shape. I was astounded. I was pleased. I was also greatly relieved and found myself enjoying the activity for once. Later I thought about all the various leaps he's made in the past couple of months—his newfound understanding of familial relations (Gram is your mother, isn't she?), his sudden interest in and aptitude for learning to read and write, and now his ability to sort puzzle shapes in multiple ways—and that's when the little light bulb went off in my brain. Those leaps and bounds were predictably related, and were the signs of his starting to move into the concrete operational stage, when children become able to properly classify, and order objects based on one or many factors. It is upon reaching this stage that children are able to recognize simultaneously two different aspects of a single object's existence (the puzzle piece can be the head of a brown dinosaur, and can also be a top edge piece in a puzzle) and successful movement into this stage is necessary before true reading (not memorized recognition of words by sight) can be taught, since a child must be able to recognize that a letter can make multiple sounds, and can be not only a letter, but also a sound, or also part of a word.

I made note of my little light bulb moment, like putting the final piece in my own puzzle, in the journal I have begun keeping on our homeschooling journey. Just writing down the discovery made me realize what an exciting moment it really was for me. I think I rank it right up there with first steps, or first foods, only really this one is even more exciting because it is so much more interactive and so much more complex.

Monday
01Mar2010

Crafting—Mr. Rogers' trees

They aren't exactly rocket science, trees made out of construction paper, toilet paper tubes, and green tissue paper, but they are all the rage in our house this week and we have Mr. Roger's to thank for it. I should preface this entire post by saying that we are not TV watchers. Calvin hadn't watched even a minute of TV, aside from catching glimpses of Michigan football games now and again, until December of last year, and then the only reason we suddenly pulled the TV trick out of the bag was because he was sick, sick, sick (and the show we watched, several times, was "Jungles" from the BBC Planet Earth collection—he still loves it). I have several moral and personal objections against most TV shows and the TV culture as a whole and in general we don't watch it, but that's for another post all together. Instead, I'll just quickly say that since its daytime debut in our household back in December, we have watched classic Sesame Street episodes a couple of times a week and various BBC Planet Earth pieces as well, and just this morning we watched Mr. Rogers for the very first time. What a riot.

With Mr. Rogers we took a trip to the recycling plant, then followed the trolley to make-believe town (I'd forgotten all about that), and then we made a craft—trees, to be exact. Calvin seemed to enjoy all of the half hour show (a perfect amount of time), and immediately after he was determined to make his own paper trees so he could have a forest for his train set. We did so, and now he has one.

Paper trees

Supplies: Pen, scissors, tape and/or glue, paper tubes of any kind (we used toilet paper and paper towel tubes), construction paper in your choice of colors, and tissue paper (preferably in green).

Mark construction paper to the size of the tube. Cut paper along marked line. Adhere paper to cardboard tube. If using glue, allow to dry (we put rubber bands around our tubes to keept he paper in place while the glue dried). Latsly, crinkle up the tissue paper, shape it into the top of a tree, and shove a small part of it into the top of the tube. Done! I also used a dab of hot glue to keep the tree tops inside the trunks so that we could have a perpetual summer for our train setting.

Friday
26Feb2010

The Korean Cinderella, by Shirley Climo

Calvin's rehash:
"It's about persons and ox and fruit. It's about Cinderella. They're mean to her. They make her do mean work. But the frog helps her fill the jug, the sparrows help her polish the rice, and the ox helps her pull out the weeds and then he eats them up. Then there's a band and then they're mad all over again. Then a man pulls out he shoe that was missing and he wants to marry her. There's a picture. They're getting married and they have a wedding."
"I love the book because I love the frog and I also love the ox."

My own thoughts? It's a fine book—the illustrations are beautiful and the writing is good. Why do I sound unenthusiastic? Really I'm not a big of most of the old fairy tales, particularly the Disney-fied ones. Cinderella is one of the books Calvin enjoys hearing again and again, and he also has the book on tape (a hold-over from his dad's childhood collection, and one that I'm certain I had, too, only on record), and at first that seemed like a grand thing. It is, after all, from the days of yore, and I tend to like vintage, eh? But the more I listen to the story, the more I am disappointed by it. Cinderella is gentle and kind and never loses her temper, and the story has a happy relatively ending, but it bothers me that she's entirely reliant on the good will of a fictional fairy godmother and an equally fictional prince charming to make it out of her oppressive life situation. Deductive moral of the story? You'd better have a fairy godmother and small feet or else you're up a creek. I'm sure I'm missing the forest for the trees—the moral of the story, after all, is that kindness is rewarded and evil loses out, right?—but something about the antiquated nature of the story line makes me cringe for girls everywhere.

That being said, I'll freely admit that I am likely over-thinking this, and I have no plans to snatch either the book or the tape out of Calvin's regular rotation. Some day we'll just have to discuss the other options that should have been available to Cinderella, like the doors opened by hard work put into a good education.

Wednesday
24Feb2010

Crafty Monday (on Wednesday)—kid-made wrapping paper

Monday it snowed. And snowed, and snowed, and snowed. So while we had every intention of spending Monday painting paper (with which to wrap a gift that I finally finished over the weekend, only one week later than its "due" date), we spent a lot of Monday outside in the warm, wet snow. Since that was the craft Calvin desperately wanted to showcase this week, I decided to make Wednesday crafty this week. I reserve that right.

Wrapping paper has been somewhat of a thorn in my side. I know it's not something a good environmentalist would use, but unwrapping a gift is so fun, especially for a kid. This is by no means my own solution to the problem, but something I've seen many, many times before, and when I suggested it to Calvin, he was ecstatic about making the paper to wrap the gift he had been watching me make. This is even double-sided wrapping paper—I always save Calvin's art paper (the ones we don't hang up) so we can use the other side as well, and we made the wrapping paper from some of this second use paper.

In Calvin's own words: "I wrote her name and I didn't want to color over her name, so I put a fence around it. And then there are all the muddy people and they won't walk on the flowers, they will be careful to walk around them. And [the girl with the big purple bandage on her hand] burned her finger at home, so she's going to the hospital."

Thursday
18Feb2010

"Slowly, Slowly, Slowly," said the Sloth, by Eric Carle

This is another book to which we keep returning on our library visits. I think the first time we read it was around two years ago when Calvin was about a year and a half and was fascinated by the variety of animals.

Here's what he has to say about the book now:

"it's about a sloth who is slowly slowly. Every animal asked him 'why are you so quiet?' 'why are you so lazy?' and 'why are you so boring?' and at the end the jaguar says 'why are you so lazy?' and he thinks for a very long time and when you turn the page [the jaguar's] gone and the monkey thinks that the sloth is talking to him when he answers the jaguar's question slowly, slowly."

Calvin likes this book because he likes the sloth. The sloth is his favorite character, the jaguar is his favorite supporting character, and his favorite part of the book is when the jaguar asks the sloth "why are you so lazy?"

As for me, I'm actually not an Eric Carle fan. I do not like the "What Do You See?" books, or most of his other learning books, but in his rather vast library I can find a handful of titles that I don't mind reading, and this is one of them. I even like the pictures in this one, which amount to a parade of South American rainforest animals, and the use of vocabulary with a hint of comedic timing adds just the right amount of humor. That's why it has become a regular visitor in our house.